Conceptual Foundations of Sovereignty and the Rise of the Modern State

This chapter explores the conceptual foundations of sovereignty in connection with the rise of the modern state. The political practice of the state as a civil association governed by a sovereign ruler arises in medieval Europe, but its first theoretical articulation is achieved in early modernity, by Jean Bodin and Thomas Hobbes. The task in what follows is to explain the conceptual connection between sovereignty and the modern state originally identified by Bodin and Hobbes, and its subsequent development in the ideas of the classical contractarians Locke, Rousseau, and Kant. The thrust of the argument is twofold: (1) that sovereignty is not a property of private persons, but a constitutive feature of the modern state as a public institution, and (2) that the sovereign state is a juridical institution as opposed to a structure of domination or of economic allocation. The analysis begins with a sketch of the discourse of sovereignty followed by a detailed examination of Bodin’s and Hobbes’s accounts of sovereignty and state. It proceeds with two brief sections on John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau whose aim is to elucidate two basic distinctions: state (Hobbes) vs. government (Locke), and state sovereignty (Hobbes) vs. popular sovereignty (Rousseau). The penultimate section discusses Kant’s idea of a state animated by the rule of law, which requires—in a constitutionalist manner—the exercise of sovereignty to be bound by morally justified legal rules. The chapter concludes with a sketch of external sovereignty which applies to the relations of states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Buy Now

eBook EUR 160.49 Price includes VAT (France)

Hardcover Book EUR 210.99 Price includes VAT (France)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

Sovereignty and the Ethical Demands of the State

The Sovereign State and the Right to Secede. Historical Examples and Theoretical Reasons Concerning the Benefits of Political Regulation

State in Renaissance Politics

References

• Bellamy, Alex, and Edward C. Luck. 2018. The Responsibility to Protect: From Promise to Practice. Cambridge: Polity. Google Scholar
• Bodin, Jean. 1962 [1606]. The Six Bookes of a Commonweale, ed. Kenneth Douglas McRae. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• ———. 1992. On Sovereignty, ed. Julian H. Franklin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Bohman, James, and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann, eds. 1997. Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
• Brierly, J. L. 1963. The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace, 6th ed., ed. C. H. M. Waldock. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
• Brown, Chris, Terry Nardin, and Nicholas Rengger, eds. 2002. International Relations in Political Thought: Texts from the Ancient Greeks to the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Cavallar, Georg. 1999. Kant and the Theory and Practice of International Right. Cardiff: University of Wales Press. Google Scholar
• Chwaszcza, Christine. 2012. The Seat of Sovereignty: Hobbes on the Artificial Person of the Commonwealth or State. Hobbes Studies 25 (2): 123–142. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, Joshua. 1999. Reflections on Rousseau: Autonomy and Democracy. In The Social Contract Theorists: Critical Essays on Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau, ed. Christopher W. Morris, 191–204. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar
• Flikschuh, Katrin. 2010. Kant’s Sovereignty Dilemma: A Contemporary Analysis. Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (4): 469–493. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Franklin, Julian H. 1992. Introduction. In Jean Bodin, On Sovereignty, ed. Julian Franklin, ix–xxvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Frost, Mervyn. 1996. Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BookGoogle Scholar
• Hochstrasser, T.J. 2000. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BookGoogle Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. 1949 [1651/1647]. De Cive or the Citizen. 1651 English translation from the second Latin edition of 1647, ed. Sterling P. Lamprecht. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts. Google Scholar
• ———. 1968 [1651]. Leviathan, ed. C.B. Macpherson. London: Penguin. Google Scholar
• ———. 1969 [1650]. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, 2nd ed., ed. Ferdinand Tönnies. London: Frank Cass. Google Scholar
• Holzgrefe, J.L., and R. Keohane, eds. 2010. Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1991. Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose (1784). In Immanuel Kant, Political Writings, 2nd ed., trans. H.B. Nisbet and ed. Hans Reiss, 41–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• ———. 1996a. Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• ———. 1996b [1793]. On The Common Saying: That May be Correct in Theory, But It Is of No Use in Practice. In Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor, 273–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• ———. 1996c [1795]. Toward Perpetual Peace (1795). In Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor, 311–352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• ———. 1996d [1797]. The Metaphysics of Morals. In Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor, 353–604. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Kavka, Gregory S. 1983. Hobbes’s War of All Against All. Ethics 93 (2): 291–310. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Kersting, Wolfgang. 1992. Kant’s Concept of the State. In Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy, ed. Howard Williams, 143–165. Cardiff: University of Wales Press. Google Scholar
• Lechner, Silviya. 2019. Hobbesian Internationalism: Anarchy, Authority and the Fate of Political Philosophy. London: Palgrave. BookGoogle Scholar
• Locke, John 1980 [1690]. Second Treatise of Government, ed. C.B. Macpherson. Indianapolis: Hackett. Google Scholar
• Mack, Eric. 2012. Locke. In The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy, ed. Gerald F. Gaus and Fred D’Agostino, 71–81. New York and London: Routledge. Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. Locke. New York and London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar
• Macpherson, C.B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• McNeilly, F.S. 1968. The Anatomy of Leviathan. New York: St Martin’s Press. Google Scholar
• Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
• Oakeshott, Michael. 1975. Introduction to Leviathan. In Hobbes on Civil Association, 1–79. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Google Scholar
• Philpott, Daniel. 1995. Sovereignty: An Introduction and Brief History. Journal of International Affairs 48 (2): 353–368. Google Scholar
• Prokhovnik, Raia. 2008. Sovereignty: History and Theory. Exeter: Imprint Academic. Google Scholar
• Riley, Patrick. 1982. Will and Political Legitimacy: A Critical Exposition of Social Contract Theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant and Hegel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. BookGoogle Scholar
• Ripstein, Arthur. 2004. Authority and Coercion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (1): 2–35. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1970a [1761]. Abstract of the Abbé de Saint Pierre’s Project for Perpetual Peace. In The Theory of International Relations: Selected Texts from Gentili to Treitschke, ed. M.G. Forsyth, H.M.A. Keens-Soper, and P. Savigear, 131–156. London: George Allen and Unwin. Google Scholar
• ———. 1970b [1782]. Judgement on Saint Pierre’s Project for Perpetual Peace. In The Theory of International Relations: Selected Texts from Gentili to Treitschke, ed. M.G. Forsyth, H.M.A. Keens-Soper, and P. Savigear, 157–166. London: George Allen and Unwin. Google Scholar
• ———. 1997. The Basic Political Writings, trans. Donald A. Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett. Google Scholar
• Runciman, David. 2000. What Kind of Person Is Hobbes’s State? A Reply to Skinner. The Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2): 268–278. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. 1999. Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State. The Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (1): 1–29. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• ———. 2009. A Genealogy of the Modern State. Proceedings of the British Academy 162: 325–370. Google Scholar
• Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
• Thompson, Martyn. 1994. Locke’s Contract in Context. In The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls, ed. David Boucher and Paul Kelly, 73–94. London and New York: Routledge. ChapterGoogle Scholar
• Tierney, Brian. 1964. The Crisis of Church and State: 1050–1300. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
• Ulph, Owen. 1947. Jean Bodin and the Estates-General of 1576. The Journal of Modern History 19 (4): 289–296. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill. Google Scholar
• Walzer, Michael. 1992. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
• Watson, Alan, ed. 1998. The Digest of Justinian, vol. I. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania University Press. Google Scholar
• Weinrib, Jacob. 2019. Sovereignty as a Right and as a Duty: Kant’s Theory of the State. In Sovereignty and the New Executive Authority, ed. Claire O. Finkelstein and Michael Skerker, 21–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Williams, Howard. 1992. International Relations in Political Theory. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Google Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Political Science, Anglo-American University (AAU), Prague, Czechia Silviya Lechner

1. Silviya Lechner

Corresponding author

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1. School of Law and Politics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK Howard Williams
2. School of Law and Politics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK David Boucher
3. School of Law and Politics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK Peter Sutch
4. Department of Philosophy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA David Reidy
5. School of Psychology and Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK Alexandros Koutsoukis

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lechner, S. (2023). Conceptual Foundations of Sovereignty and the Rise of the Modern State. In: Williams, H., Boucher, D., Sutch, P., Reidy, D., Koutsoukis, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of International Political Theory. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36111-1_20

Download citation

• .RIS
• .ENW
• .BIB

• DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36111-1_20
• Published : 03 November 2023
• Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
• Print ISBN : 978-3-031-36110-4
• Online ISBN : 978-3-031-36111-1
• eBook Packages : Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative